Internet Radio

Shuman officially appeals to President Ali to meet with Harmon on appointing Chancellor, Chief Justice, Police Commissioner

Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 October 2021, 11:47 by Denis Chabrol

The Leader of the small opposition Liberty and Justice Party (LJP)  Lenox Shuman has formally asked President Ali to set aside calls for the opposition A Partnership for National Unity+Alliance For Change (APNU+AFC) to first publicly  recognise the government before consultations are held with Opposition Leader Joseph Harmon.

In that regard, Mr Shuman, in his capacity as Deputy Speaker, told the President that in fact Mr Harmon has in fact recognised the People’s Progressive Party Civic administration by accepting the position of Opposition Leader.

Mr. Shuman indicated that Dr. Ali needs to meet with Mr. Harmon on key substantive appointments of a Chancellor, Chief Justice and Police Commissioner.

Mr. Shuman recently held separate talks with the Opposition Leader and Prime Minister Mark Phillips.

Recently, Prime Minister Mark Phillips and Governance Minister Gail Teixeira said the time has come for all parties to meet and discuss the future of Guyana instead of haggling of race-based politics.

 

Following is the full text of Mr. Shuman’s letter.

 

His Excellency Dr. Mohamed I. Ali

President of Guyana

Office of the President,

Shiv Chanderpal Drive,

Georgetown.

Dear Excellency,

Appointment of Chancellor, Chief Justice, Commissioner of Police, and Chief of Staff

I bring to your attention the concerns at the weakened state of the Judicial Arm of Government with hopes of persuading you to rectify them.

Currently there are four (4) critical acting appointments, namely, the Chief Justice (Ag), the Chancellor of the Judiciary (Ag), the Commissioner of Police (Ag), and the Chief of Staff (Ag).

Your administration marked the completion of its first year in office on 2 August 2021, and despite calls by the previous President of the Caribbean Court of Justice, Sir Dennis Byron, and the current President, Justice Adrian Saunders for the confirmation of Substantive appointments of the Chancellor of the Judiciary and Chief Justice made under the previous administration, there has been no movement on these critical appointments.

The Constitution of Guyana provides that the Court of Appeal shall consist of a Chancellor, Chief Justice and such number of Justice as shall be prescribed by Parliament. It also provides that the Judges of the High Court shall be the Chief Justice and such other Puisne Judges as may be prescribed by Parliament (Articles 124 and 125 of the Constitution). For about a decade and a half – since 2005 – the Judges holding the positions of Chancellor and Chief Justice have been acting in these positions.

The Constitution also provides that: “All courts and persons presiding over the courts shall exercise their functions independently of the control and direction of any other person and authority; and shall be free and independent from political, executive and any other form of direction and control” (Article 122 A (1) of the Constitution).

In November, 2017, Sir Dennis Byron, the President of the Caribbean Court of Justice, at the 37th Annual Bar Dinner held at the Pegasus Hotel, called for the confirmation of the acting appointments of the Chancellor and Chief Justice. Sir Dennis said: “This situation has moved well beyond what ought to be acceptable in a modern democracy where respect for the rule of law is maintained. The constitution envisages the judiciary of Guyana to be headed by officials who are substantively appointed and enjoy all the legal and institutional mechanisms to secure their tenure. Anything otherwise is, to my mind, a violation of the spirit and intent of the constitution.”  (Guyana Chronicle of 14th November, 2017).

Having regard to the fact that Article 127(1) of the Constitution provides that “the Chancellor and the Chief Justice shall each be appointed by the President, acting after obtaining the agreement of the Leader of the Opposition,” I urge Your Excellency to urgently confer with the Leader of the Opposition with a view to securing his agreement for substantive appointments to these positions. The failure to rectify the omission to fill these positions with substantive appointments means the continuing “violation of the spirit and intent of the constitution.”

Excellency, I have noted your position in relation to the Leader of the Opposition. I have also noted the constitutional requirements for consultations with the Leader of the Opposition on certain appointments.

I wish to underscore that in his accepting the role of Leader of the Opposition, Honourable Joseph Harmon has acknowledged the legitimacy of your administration and as such leaves no obstacle in undertaking the consultative process for such appointments. Respectfully, I further share the view that in the absence of any constitutional requirement for any such acknowledgement as you have iterated publicly, the path is unobstructed to commence any and all processes requiring consultation with the Leader of the Opposition.

I therefore humbly urge Your Excellency to act on this matter as soon as possible and, hoping that you would so do, I assure Your Excellency of my highest consideration.

Sincerely Yours

 

_____________________

Hon. Lenox R. O. Shuman

Deputy Speaker; MP