Internet Radio

Carvil Duncan blocks Tribunal from proceeding with removal hearing

The High Court has ordered the suspension of the work of a Presidential Tribunal that has been established to determine whether Chairman of the Public Service Commission, Carvil Duncan should be removed from office because he is currently facing criminal charges.

In court papers seen by Demerara Waves Online News,  Justice Franklin Holder prohibited Justice Roxanne George (chair of the Tribunal), Retired Justice Winston Patterson and Robert Ramcharran from proceeding to investigate Duncan’s removal from office as a member and chairman of the Public Service Commission, Judicial Service Commission and the Police Service Commission , unless sufficient cause is shown why the said Order or Rule Nisi of Prohibition should not be made absolute.

“The enquiry by the tribunal prejudices the Applicant’s fair trial rights. The decision to investigate the Applicant reflects a premature conclusion and/or opinion by the State that he is guilty even before he is tried and proved guilty before the Court which is properly seized of the criminal charges preferred against him,” Duncan’s lawyer, Anil Nandlall said in court papers.

The grounds are that the inquiry that they have embarked upon is unconstitutionally, unlawfully, illegally, prematurely, prejudicially, contrary to the rules of natural justice, arbitrarily, capriciously and in breach of the Applicant’s legitimate expectation and is null, void and of no effect.

Justice Holder also quashed Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo’s advice to President David Granger that the question of removing Duncan from those Commissions ought to be investigated  on the grounds that the said advice was tendered is unconstitutionally, unlawfully, illegally, prematurely, prejudicially, contrary to the rules of natural justice, arbitrarily, capriciously and in breach of the Applicant’s legitimate expectation and is null, void and of no effect.

Duncan said in court papers that he never received the Prime Minister’s letter asking him to show cause why a Tribunal should not have been set up to investigate his removal from office. He said he was never afforded an opportunity to be heard. “The applicant never received the said letter. The Prime Minster failed when requested to do so in writing to provide any evidence to establish delivery of the said letter to the Applicant,” said Nandlall.

Duncan recalled that Nandlall had informed the Tribunal that it was objecting to it proceeding with the hearing because “no hearing was afforded to me prior to the Prime Minister tendering his advice to the President to launch that my removal from office should be investigated pursuant to Article 225 (4) of the Constitution and therefore, the tribunal itself, was unlawfully established;

that the course of action which the tribunal is embarking upon is in violation of and repugnant to the presumption of innocence accorded to me as a fundamental right and freedom by Article 144 of the Constitution and therefore the tribunal will be acting unconstitutionally, unlawfully and illegally,” he said

Efforts by government to remove Duncan stem from the fact that he is currently facing larceny charges in the Magistrates Court in connection with the payment and his receipt of almost one million dollars in director fees from the Guyana Power and Light (GPL).

  • Emile_Mervin

    A temporary win for Carvil Duncan, but in the end, Duncan has to go. Not because he is a PPP lackey, but because he paid himself $900,000+ without legal authorization, which is larceny by a public official.

    Meanwhile, I do find it puzzling that Chief Justice Roxanne George would acquiesce to a government inspired Tribunal and a subordinate judge would rule to bar the Chief Justice from proceeding with the Tribunal’s hearing.

    While we are sailing in uncharted waters, the ruling embarrasses the Chief Justice for failing to see what her subordinate sees in this matter.

    Will we now see Duncan’s misappropriation trial fast tracked to ensure he is formally found guilty? Judge Franklin Holder has to be living on a different planet not to know the cause for which the Tribunal was set up was because of Duncan’s well publicized role in a conspiracy to misappropriate public funds and actual misappropriation of public funds. Duncan should step down until the court matter is over.

    • rs dasai

      You have missed your calling. You should be the CJ. Do not try to embarrass her or Justice Holder. And you have already tried and convicted Mr. Duncan.

      • Emile_Mervin

        Duncan acknowledged he took the money and no one authorized him to, despite earlier saying Sam Hinds and then Bharat Dindyal authorized the payment, which both denied, so Duncan is guilty by acknowledgement. Even his co-conspirator agreed to repay the money while in hiding abroad, but has not made good on his promise.

        • rs dasai

          Such being the case, he should be charged and let the Courts do the rest. Where is our AG?

          • Emile_Mervin

            He was already charged, but given he committed grand larceny involving public funds, he disqualified himself temporarily from public office until his case is finished. But just like the rest of the PPP thieves still in Parliament holding public jobs, Duncan, a PPP lackey thinks he should keep his jobs on the service commissions.

  • Col123

    Brother SB:..Following your premise about “the then ag did not observe those same constitutional guarantees’….you are suggesting that we , who should know better, should continue on the same track….and usurp those constitutional rights…again!…and in the same breadth…spouting those virtues as you mentioned!…!!!!

  • Emile_Mervin

    Do I have to be a lawyer to have common sense? There are judicial officers who are loyal to Jagdeo and the PPP, which is why Jagdeo was cleared to run again for the presidency.

    • rs dasai

      Dr. Jagdeo is not and cannot run again. He is lame.

      • Emile_Mervin

        Google ‘Jagdeo cleared to run again’, and read Stabroek News of July 9, 2015, and Kaieteur News of July 10, 2015. Chief Justice Chang, like Justice Holder, was a Jagdeo appointee. Loyalty counts in Guyanese politics.