Internet Radio

Full disclosure of oil production sharing agreements not advisable- Natural Resources Minister

ExxonMobil’s Stabroek Block concession offshore Guyana.

Minister of Natural Resources, Raphael Trotman on Thursday cautioned against releasing details of oil exploration and production contracts because of the likely implications this may have for addressing border claims by Suriname and Venezuela.

“Government, at this point in time, is of the view that full disclosure would not be to the national benefit or the national interest,” he told a breakfast engagement with the media held at Herdmanston Lodge, Queenstown, Georgetown.

His comments come against the background of Guyana on the last effort by the United Nations (UN) to mediate in a border controversy with Venezuela over that country’s claim of the mineral and forest-rich Essequibo Region. If that fails, the UN Secretary General will refer the controversy to the International Court of Justice also known as the World Court.  Earlier this week, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres appointed Norwegian diplomat, Dag Halvor Nylander  as his personal representative to try to settle the longstanding border controversy “with a strengthened mandate of mediation.”

The Minister of Natural Resources, who holds a Master of Arts Degree in International Relations (Security & Development Economics) from the  Fletcher School  of  Law  &  Diplomacy at the United States-based Tufts  University, said he would personally advise against full disclosure at this critical juncture.

Trotman, however, said the Guyana government would be willing to disclose important aspects of the Production Sharing Agreement with American oil giant ExxonMobil which plans to begin commercial oil production at the Stabroek Block located more than 100 miles offshore. “Right now, we are prepared to share the salient features of the contract,” said the minister who is also the holder of a Post Graduate Certificate in Defence Planning & Resource Management from the United States National Defense University.

He explained that it is a 50-50 Production Sharing Agreement, with provision being made to recover the cost of finding and exploiting the reservoir. “We are already wealthy. We are going to be wealthy. We have no reason right now to expose all our business to the world,” he said.

The Minister said government declined to reopen the agreement in its entirety for negotiations to avoid Guyana being labelled as a country  that does not recognise the sanctity of contracts. “It was not altogether a bad contract,” he said, adding that Guyana would in the future seek to negotiate better terms.

  • Emile_Mervin

    Okay, so we won’t know the technical specifics of the oil deal, but how about telling Guyanese how much is their cut? For example, is it like the parking meters deal of 80% for the investor and 20% for Guyana? What exactly are Guyanese getting out of this deal, Raph?

    • eddie

      they don’t want to embarrassed the PPP by exposing the deal and it not doing so it give them the freeway to pilfer

      • rs dasai

        Embarrass them.

  • Rohit Parmananad

    Arent we supposed to be idolising norway… Norway has all of its business on the table. The Minister could have attained his certificate in heaven. The people of guyana needs to know that deal.

  • rudeo

    half of 25% is for guyana..that was already announced

  • Emile_Mervin


  • Col123

    ” a reasoned position”…someone is grasping at straws there…don’t underestimate your make believe enemies…there isn’t any implications or relevance to border claims…those neighboring folks are way ahead with experience in the business…

  • Col123

    “We are already wealthy. We are going to be wealthy. “…..there are over a hundred ways to parse that ….but I would just say that a fool and his money are soon parted….For those who constantly speak about caste and class, you should note that this minister owns the rights, of what an ignorant low class human looks like……… any other braggart..

  • rs dasai

    Hey Guiryls
    The Minister has to be very cautious as to what information the Gvt makes public. He is right about Venezuela’s claim however spurious it is. We do not have the burden and responsibility of the GVt, so please cut him some slack and give the Gvt the benefit of the doubt. Citizens do not have a right to know ‘everything’ the GVT does, Please.

    • Agreed !…..Avoid envious ,greedy eyes becoming more inflamed……A still tongue always keep a wise head ! Guyana is sitting/floating upon oil !
      Can’t spoil; can’t done !